1. CRIME DOWN, MEDIA CRIME COVERAGE STILL HIGH?:
A recent Brookings Institute report reconfirms a little-known fact: Crime is going down in the U.S. in both the ‘burbs and major cities and has been decreasing for a while.
Yet, the sensational coverage on Headline “News” and local six o’clock broadcasts remains the same, making communities (more) leery of their own neighbors. And preventing people from realizing the downward trend that has existed for more than a decade.
To TV stations, crime stories are the drama they need pull in viewers and ratings, and, not least of all, advertisers. Crime stories are what they actively seek to catch on film as it unfolds. A case-in-point: the Casey Anthony trial coverage.
From Nancy Grace (Why does she still have TV show? Exhibit A) to strangers in the street, the “guilt” of an un-convicted “Tot Mom” accused of killing her child is already decided in many minds. The whole media circus proves to me that tragic Peyton Place scandals should stay local and not be broadcasted to a national audience. When national broadcasters “pick up” their local affiliate stories, they cheapen sensitive, emotional stories and frame them as soap operas with daily updates, which viewers can tune into to catch the latest “episode.”
And I can’t flip channels fast enough to avoid catching a glimpse of polls asking viewers to decide a defendant’s guilt. I thought that’s what a judge and jury was for…
Rajaratnam was convicted in one of the largest insider-trader cases in U.S. history. His conviction in May, lacked the drama of Anthony’s, but the impact affects me more.
When the “financial wizards of the Darks Arts” act up, you’re guaranteed there’s a ripple effect that WILL affect everyone. Stock markets and their investors are an emotionally unstable, high-maintenance pair: They will react to every outcome; from a slap on the wrist to being sentenced in a jail cell beside Bernie Madoff. Their reaction may cause downturns or upshots that send the economy (and every American) on an emotional roller-coaster.
As the financial crisis shows, the doings of financial wizards deserves more scrutiny than the messy relationship of a Orlando family.
2. A BLUNDER IN-THE-MAKING FOR THE HUFFPOST & RATHER?:
In other news, Dan Rather lets an albatross loose to shh…– as Nicki Minaj (yes, I went there) would say – on those already predicting the chair-swapping between Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Jamie Dimon, CEO of J.P. Morgan. According to Rather’s research producer, legal documents show that under Dimon’s watch JPM experienced an oversight worth $1.5 billion.
The report’s gist: If Dimon can’t keep his eyes on private investors’ money, the public can’t expect him to do any better by them.
An air date of this show has yet to be posted on the official website.
I’m going to keeping my eye on this. Less we forget the Bush-‘Nam report fiasco. That ‘Nam report is the reason he’s on the HDNET in the first place and not back anchoring at his ole CBS stomping ground.
Although Dimon is never mentioned in the piece, HuffPost makes sure to post his picture as an avatar.
3. COULD-WOULDA-SHOULDA SCENARIOS WITH $4 TRILLION TO IMPROVE THE U.S.:
Grist inspired by a WSJ MarketBeat blog post decided to make a list that the estimated total $3.2 to 4 trillion price tag of the Iraq and Afghanistan war efforts could’ve been used for instead. The estimated price tag comes from a Brown University study that excludes future interest on war expenses.
The list of could-woulda-shoulda’s the green magazine came up with include the affirmatives to these four questions:
- Want to make our trade balance with China history?
- Wouldn’t mind being one of the lucky 18 million homeowners living rent-free?
- Do you think the children are the future and you believe in universal preschool is key?
- Do you think that more than just the East Coast should have metro transit trains that actually take people where they need to go?